<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Parking Lot Fields &#187; Avatar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theparkinglotfields.com/tag/avatar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theparkinglotfields.com</link>
	<description>a poltical pop culture wake-up call</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 18:36:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why District 9 is a Better Flick than Avatar</title>
		<link>http://theparkinglotfields.com/2010/01/05/why-district-9-is-a-better-flick-than-avatar/</link>
		<comments>http://theparkinglotfields.com/2010/01/05/why-district-9-is-a-better-flick-than-avatar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 11:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>plfields</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pop Culture Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Avatar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[District 9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political satire]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theparkinglotfields.wordpress.com/?p=9</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this post I manage to connect the Palestinian-Israeli conflict with the sci-fi movie District 9. Next post I will explain how 30 Rock is actually all about abortion! Just kidding, but seriously I will stop talking about sci-fi movies after this.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Way before everyone was clamoring about Avatar and its huge cost and profitability, District 9 was raising some eyebrows of its own.   Just recently released on DVD, I was able to <em>viddy </em>this interesting film over the holidays. I must admit I enjoyed it more thoroughly than Avatar.</p>
<p>Though the effects in District 9 are comparable to the latest Star Wars films, with fully computer animated characters lacking the serene facial expressions of Cameron’s Na’vi in Avatar, the film still manages to trump Avatar with style and substance.  The mockumentary narrative combined with the fake live action news helicopter shots brings the grit in District 9. The film makes the audience feel as if the action on screen has actually taken place.  While Avatar whisks us a way to an adventure land far far away, District 9 brings the aliens have to earth, Cape-town, South Africa to be precise.</p>
<p>Furthermore, instead of furry blue humanoids with tails (how whimsical, don’t we wish we all had one) we’re greeted with insect like bipeds with an appetite for destruction and cat food. The fearsome and ugly aliens of District 9 make the audience think harder than do the Na’vi of Avatar. While the Na’vi are reminiscent of our cats, Smurfs, and Native Americans, the “prawns” in District 9 initially make the audience want run out to stock up on roach bombs.  Yet both movies ask the viewer to reevaluate our thought process when it comes to relating to those different from ourselves. The difference is while Avatar asks the audience to understand the simple, District 9 begs us to deal with the complex.</p>
<p>I am reminded of an incident in one of my classes, when a student that we’ll call Dim brought up an interesting dilemma he was running into when it came to the Palestinian and Israeli conflict.  He queried, “Why doesn’t the U.S. or Israel go in and kill all of Hamas… I don’t get it they are a terrorist organization. I mean they’ve killed people and had suicide bombers.” Lets just forget for a moment that Hamas has been voted into office by the Palestinians and that Governments are just organizations that are allowed to kill people.</p>
<p>Laughing it up with my Anarchist friend out in the hall, he pitied the fool, “Yeah, some people don’t get it. If you take peoples land, knock down their houses with bulldozers and tanks, treat them as less than human, and kill vast swarms of the and eventually&#8230; <em>they fight back</em>. “ Obviously we’re looking at two different sides of the spectrum when it comes to this topic.  But take into consideration the bias at which the media reports on the conflict before you start labeling me the unpatriotic traitorous sedition artist that I proudly am.  The New York Times for example in 2000 and 2001 reported the deaths of Israeli and Palestinian children to be more or less equal, when in fact five times as many Palestinian children had died in the conflict than Israelis.</p>
<p>Unfortunately most people are two caught up with the image of “Terrorist” to see past the masks and AK-47 to the suffering and desperate eyes of a brutalized people.  District 9 brings this phenomenon in sci-fi format.  Instead of the simple right and wrong involved in the moral dilemma of invading a planet that isn’t ours, the audience must figure the moral dilemma of how to treat an ugly imperfect uninvited population that needs help.</p>
<p>Instead of offering an anti-colonial message in a post colonial empire, District 9 reminds us that things aren’t so simple as they seem and some times we need to look past our predelictions in order to understand what people are going through.  Because no matter how many Dims or Bill O’Riellys there are to tell us things are simple and that terrorists, illegal immigrants, or whatever easily identifiable scapegoats are the source of all our problems, we still have to live together.  Thus hurting perceived enemies then leads to real enemies, which we then have to live with. Seeing as the population here on earth is rising, learning to live peacefully with one another doesn’t seem to be a problem that will be going away soon. So next time some humanoid looks more like a disgusting bi-ped insect with drooling mandibles remember, that there is something soft underneath that exoskeleton, something you shouldn’t miss.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://theparkinglotfields.com/2010/01/05/why-district-9-is-a-better-flick-than-avatar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why You Shouldn&#8217;t Get Too Excited About Avatar</title>
		<link>http://theparkinglotfields.com/2009/12/30/why-you-shouldnt-get-too-excited-about-avatar/</link>
		<comments>http://theparkinglotfields.com/2009/12/30/why-you-shouldnt-get-too-excited-about-avatar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 13:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>plfields</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pop Culture Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Avatar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coltan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Cameron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political satire]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theparkinglotfields.wordpress.com/?p=6</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cameron’s movie about exploiting a fictitious alien people for their mineral wealth, would not have been possible (or at least not as cheap) with out the real exploitation of people for their mineral wealth.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James Cameron’s Avatar is proving it can go the distance, in terms of dollars and cents anyway.  Together with Sherlock Holmes, the two blockbusters drove ticket sales to an all time high this Christmas weekend. No matter how you feel about the movie it is impossible to ignore. A friend’s status on facebook reads  “Avatar&#8230;the most INCREDIBLE movie I have ever seen&#8230;EVER.” While returning gifts at Guitar Center I over heard the salesman prattling on about how if any one starts a sentence with “I want to see” he immediately interrupts them with “–Avatar.”  He seemed very proud of his clairvoyance on the issue after nauseatingly interceding that his co-worker wanted to see avatar. So Mr. Cameron you’ve done it again. You’ve created another megalith of intoxicating American culture.  Unfortunately sir, I feel the absurdity of the whole situation is lost on you.<br />
While most reviews acknowledge that the plot is a little weak (basically Dances With Wolves with twelve foot tall blue aliens instead of Native Americans), they all give it up for the special effects. However, I’ve yet to read anything that thoroughly points out the absurdity of the flower power message in this ultra high tech packaging. The moral of the movie is basically that pillaging the environment and people to get rich is wrong. Seems simple enough. Unfortunately, the movie costs somewhere between 300 million and half a billion dollars to produce and market. Never mind pointing out how many millions of pound of rice that could have bought for oppressed peoples around the globe the movie tries to teach us about (600 million pounds of rice if rice is $1000 per ton and the movie cost 300 Million, enough to feed 1/10 of the world for a few days). This statistic is superficial, considering the rise in price of rice from dumping $300 million on any given day in the market would likely hurt the worlds poor by driving up the cost. Also, the money spent on Avatar was an investment. Like all investments, it’s meant to yield a profit, not help the disenfranchised.  Nonetheless Cameron chose to not just to make a visually stunning movie but also to preach an anti-imperialistic message, opening himself up to the criticism of believers and heretics alike.<br />
So Cameron’s antagonist is basically the military industrial complex portrayed by the RDA Corporation and the U.S. Marine Force. They are pillaging the Na’vi and their home planet of Pandora to mine unobtanium. A fictional mineral that is extremely valuable back on earth. The Na’vi, however, are the predictable wise savages whose intrinsic appreciation for nature represents a truer Truth. This is all fine and good, but how pathetic is it that the average American needs a completely virtual world manufactured for them in order to listen to bedtime story about nature? Ironically this may be the trick to getting the masses to understand their own complex relationship with the environment. Perhaps the deluded drooling hoards need CGI blue aliens to tell them what they should have read in books. Perhaps it is a worthwhile investment.<br />
Before we let Cameron completely off the hook, let’s ask if he knows what made the production of Avatar possible? Eh. You give up… okay, it’s microprocessors. Perhaps more specifically what is needed to make a microprocessor? One needs a super conductor for that. Where does this super conductor come prêt ell? It comes from Africa, the Democratic Republic of the Congo. In the war-torn nation Western backed factions are engaged in a fierce civil war for a mineral almost as farcical sounding as unobtanium. Columbite-tantalite otherwise known as Coltan is used in everything from your smart phone to your TV remote control. So quite literally Cameron’s movie about exploiting a fictitious alien people for their mineral wealth, would not have been possible (or at least not as cheap) with out the real exploitation of people for their mineral wealth.  I am guilty too. These musings are brought to you via the same bloody mineral.  I just wonder if Cameron understands the costs and the absurdity of his “revolutionary” and “ground breaking” film.<br />
&#8220;I think the film is a plea for us to open our eyes to see each other as human beings, for what we are, to see past the cultural differences, to respect nature, respect each other, and to respect other cultures,&#8221; said Cameron. This is a great sentiment, but I wonder if gangly blue aliens really are needed.  Cameron could have just made a movie about the actual Congo. Then again there wouldn’t be as much opportunity for special effects wizardry, Cameron’s forte. God forbid the audience would have been forced to sit through a movie that is reliant on his dialogue. Also a film that explains how cheap consumer electronics require the suffering of hundreds of thousands of people could negatively affect the bluray sales. Indeed, why would any major motion picture studio waste the time and money raising awareness for a real issue that effects real people when they could make up an allegory that leaves people conveniently ignorant about their own imperialistic tendencies.  Real issues are sad. Fake issues are spectacular.<br />
Furthermore, for all the money and razzle-dazzle packed in this film, Cameron fails to illuminate the audience past the point of triteness.  He has the spiritual leader of the Na’vi remind us to empty our cup. Then Sigourney Weaver tells us there is an interconnectedness of all things. However, instead of explaining this interconnectedness as a real phenomenon (that you are the great magician who makes the grass green), he relies on his fantasyland. On Pandora the na’vi can connect to the network of energy that runs through the plants and “download and upload” knowledge about their ancestors. Cameron’s Buddhist new age philosophy fails to challenge the viewer past a third grad comprehension of reality. I doubt Cameron’s own philosophical inquiries have led him further than googling “Buddhist sayings” and reading an Inconvenient Truth. If they have he certainly doesn’t let the audience in on his ponderings.  There are certainly plenty of sources (Lao Tzu, James Joyce, Robert Anton Wilson, Joseph Heller, Henry David Thoreau) Cameron could have tapped into, but apparently he was too busy tweaking his special effects to spend time learning about the ideas he was trying to express. In the end it appears that Cameron’s cup is indeed overflowing and Avatar was yet another pointless and absurd money rake. A common feature in our society, that leaves me rather unimpressed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://theparkinglotfields.com/2009/12/30/why-you-shouldnt-get-too-excited-about-avatar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
